• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to footer
Research agenda for e-assessment of undergraduate mathematics
  • Contributors
  • Themes
  • Questions

    Ian Jones

    Loughborough University

    • I.Jones@lboro.ac.uk
    • www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/mec/staff/ian-jones/
    • ianjones
    • 0000-0003-1392-8986

    Ian is a Reader in Educational Assessment, with a particular interest in methods based on comparative judgement. He leads on STACK development and research at Loughborough University.

    Questions

    Ian is a contributor to these questions:

    • Q1: What common errors do students make when answering online assessment questions?
    • Q3: What are the approaches to detecting and feeding back on students’ errors?
    • Q6: What difficulties appear when designing e-assessment tasks that give constructive feedback to students?
    • Q11: What are the relative merits of addressing student errors up-front in the teaching compared with using e-assessment to detect and give feedback on errors after they are made?
    • Q17: What are students' views on e-assessment, and what are their expectations from automated feedback?
    • Q19: How can peer assessment be used as part of e-assessment?
    • Q21: What design methodologies and principles are used by e-assessment task designers?
    • Q32: What advice and guidance (both practical and pedagogical) is available to lecturers about using e-assessment in their courses, and to what extent do they engage with it?
    • Q44: How can e-assessment using comparative judgment support learning?
    • Q45: How can comparative judgement be used for e-assessment?
    Previous Next
    © 2023 Research agenda for e-assessment of undergraduate mathematics. Powered by Jekyll & Minimal Mistakes.