Themes >
Design and implementation choices
Code | Question | Contributors |
---|---|---|
Task design principles |
||
Q21 | What design methodologies and principles are used by e-assessment task designers? | |
Q22 | What principles should inform the design of e-assessment tasks? | |
Q23 | E-assessment task designers often convert questions that could be asked on a traditional pen and paper exam: what are the implications, technicalities, affordances and drawbacks of this approach? | |
Randomisation |
||
Q24 | To what extent does the randomisation of question parameters, which makes sharing answers between students difficult, adequately address plagiarism? | |
Q25 | What effect does the use of random versions of a question (e.g. using parameterised values) have on the outcomes of e-assessment? | |
Q26 | When writing multiple choice questions, is student learning better enhanced using distractors based on common errors, or randomly-generated distractors? | |
Roles of e-assessment in course design |
||
Q27 | How can formative e-assessments improve students’ performance in later assessments? | |
Q28 | How can regular summative e-assessments support learning? | |
Q29 | What are suitable roles for e-assessment in formative and summative assessment? | |
Q30 | To what extent does the timing and frequency of e-assessments during a course affect student learning? | |
Q31 | What are the relations between the mode of course instruction and students' performance and activity in e-assessment? | |
Lecturer guidance |
||
Q32 | What advice and guidance (both practical and pedagogical) is available to lecturers about using e-assessment in their courses, and to what extent do they engage with it? | |
Q33 | What might a “hierarchy of needs” look like for lecturers who are transitioning to increased use of e-assessments? | |
Q34 | How can lecturers be informed about how students interact with e-assessment tasks, and so help lecturers act upon these findings in an effective way? |