Themes >
Design and implementation choices
| Code | Question | Contributors |
|---|---|---|
Task design principles |
||
| Q21 | What design methodologies and principles are used by e-assessment task designers? |
|
| Q22 | What principles should inform the design of e-assessment tasks? |
|
| Q23 | E-assessment task designers often convert questions that could be asked on a traditional pen and paper exam: what are the implications, technicalities, affordances and drawbacks of this approach? |
|
Randomisation |
||
| Q24 | To what extent does the randomisation of question parameters, which makes sharing answers between students difficult, adequately address plagiarism? |
|
| Q25 | What effect does the use of random versions of a question (e.g. using parameterised values) have on the outcomes of e-assessment? |
|
| Q26 | When writing multiple choice questions, is student learning better enhanced using distractors based on common errors, or randomly-generated distractors? |
|
Roles of e-assessment in course design |
||
| Q27 | How can formative e-assessments improve students’ performance in later assessments? |
|
| Q28 | How can regular summative e-assessments support learning? |
|
| Q29 | What are suitable roles for e-assessment in formative and summative assessment? |
|
| Q30 | To what extent does the timing and frequency of e-assessments during a course affect student learning? |
|
| Q31 | What are the relations between the mode of course instruction and students' performance and activity in e-assessment? |
|
Lecturer guidance |
||
| Q32 | What advice and guidance (both practical and pedagogical) is available to lecturers about using e-assessment in their courses, and to what extent do they engage with it? |
|
| Q33 | What might a “hierarchy of needs” look like for lecturers who are transitioning to increased use of e-assessments? |
|
| Q34 | How can lecturers be informed about how students interact with e-assessment tasks, and so help lecturers act upon these findings in an effective way? |
|













